University of Sussex
Browse
DOCUMENT
HopkinsRussellMcIntyreLeavens2013.pdf (276.39 kB)
DOCUMENT
HopkinsRussellMcIntyreLeavens2013.pdf (476.18 kB)
1/0
2 files

Are chimpanzees really so poor at understanding imperative pointing? Some new data and an alternative view of canine and ape social cognition

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 15:56 authored by William D Hopkins, Jamie L Russell, Joe McIntyre, David LeavensDavid Leavens
There is considerable interest in comparative research on different species’ abilities to respond to human communicative cues such as gaze and pointing. It has been reported that some canines perform significantly better than monkeys and apes on tasks requiring the comprehension of either declarative or imperative pointing and these differences have been attributed to domestication in dogs. Here we tested a sample of chimpanzees on a task requiring comprehension of an imperative request and show that, though there are considerable individual differences, the performance by the apes rival those reported in pet dogs. We suggest that small differences in methodology can have a pronounced influence on performance on these types of tasks. We further suggest that basic differences in subject sampling, subject recruitment and rearing experiences have resulted in a skewed representation of canine abilities compared to those of monkeys and apes.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

PLoS ONE

ISSN

1932-6203

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Issue

11

Volume

8

Article number

e79338

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2013-11-25

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC