File(s) not publicly available
Are men better than women at acoustic size judgements?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 18:40 authored by Benjamin D Charlton, Anna M Taylor, David RebyFormants are important phonetic elements of human speech that are also used by humans and non-human mammals to assess the body size of potential mates and rivals. As a consequence, it has been suggested that formant perception, which is crucial for speech perception, may have evolved through sexual selection. Somewhat surprisingly, though, no previous studies have examined whether sexes differ in their ability to use formants for size evaluation. Here, we investigated whether men and women differ in their ability to use the formant frequency spacing of synthetic vocal stimuli to make auditory size judgements over a wide range of fundamental frequencies (the main determinant of vocal pitch). Our results reveal that men are significantly better than women at comparing the apparent size of stimuli, and that lower pitch improves the ability of both men and women to perform these acoustic size judgements. These findings constitute the first demonstration of a sex difference in formant perception, and lend support to the idea that acoustic size normalization, a crucial prerequisite for speech perception, may have been sexually selected through male competition. We also provide the first evidence that vocalizations with relatively low pitch improve the perception of size-related formant information.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
Biology LettersISSN
1744-9561Publisher
Royal Society, TheExternal DOI
Issue
4Volume
9Page range
20130270-20130270Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes