University of Sussex
Browse

Confidence intervals for robust estimates of measurement uncertainty

Download (1.76 MB)
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:16
Version 1 2023-06-09, 19:49
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:16 authored by Peter D Rostron, Tom Fearn, Michael H Ramsey
Uncertainties arising at different stages of a measurement process can be estimated using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) on duplicated measurements. In some cases it is also desirable to calculate confidence intervals for these uncertainties. This can be achieved using probability models that assume the measurement data are normally distributed. However, it is often the case in practice that a set of otherwise normally distributed measurement values is contaminated by a small number of outlying values, which may have a disproportionate effect on the variances calculated using the ‘classical’ form of ANOVA. In this case, robust ANOVA methods are able to provide variance estimates that are much closer to the parameters of the underlying normal distributions. A method using bootstrapping to calculate confidence intervals from robust estimates of variances is proposed and evaluated, and is shown to work well when the number of outlying values is small. The method has been implemented in a Visual Basic program.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

ISSN

0949-1775

Publisher

Springer

Department affiliated with

  • Evolution, Behaviour and Environment Publications

Notes

The notations Fp,?1,?2 and ?2 p,? in Eqs. (1), (2) and (3) correspond to that of Graybill [8], for whom the probability p is that in the upper tail. Thus they correspond to the inverse cumulative distribution functions of the respective distributions evaluated for a probability of 1-p and not for a probability p as stated in the paragraph immediately above these equations. The correct interpretation was used in coding the RANOVA3 software and in all the other computations reported in the paper. The originally published text at the top of the third page is: Fp, ?1, ?2 is the inverse cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the F probability distribution with degrees of freedom ?1, ?2 for a probability p, and ?2 p,? is the inverse cdf of the chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom ? for probability p. The corrected text therefore is: Fp, ?1, ?2 is the inverse cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the F probability distribution with degrees of freedom ?1, ?2 for a probability 1-p, and ?2 p,? is the inverse cdf of the chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom ? for probability 1-p.

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2019-12-04

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2020-02-24

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2019-12-03

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC