File(s) not publicly available
Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 12:42 authored by Nicolay Gausel, Colin Wayne Leach, Vivian VignolesVivian Vignoles, Rupert BrownResearch on shame about in-group moral failure has yielded paradoxical results. In some studies, shame predicts self-defensive motivations to withdraw. In other studies, shame predicts pro-social motivations, such as restitution. We think that this paradox can be explained by disentangling the numerous appraisals and feelings subsumed under the label “shame.” In 2 studies, we asked community samples of Norwegians about their in-group's discrimination against the Tater minority. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the measures of the appraisals and feelings used in Study 1 ( N = 206) and Study 2 ( N = 173). In both studies, an appraisal of the in-group as suffering a moral defect best predicted felt shame, whereas an appraisal of concern for condemnation of the in-group best predicted felt rejection. In both studies, felt rejection best predicted self-defensive motivation, whereas felt shame best predicted pro-social motivation. Implications for conceptualizing and studying shame are discussed.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyISSN
0022-3514Publisher
American Psychological AssociationExternal DOI
Issue
5Volume
102Page range
941-960Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes