File(s) not publicly available
Different circuit and monoamine mechanisms consolidate long-term memory in aversive and reward classical conditioning
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 20:11 authored by Ildiko KemenesIldiko Kemenes, Michael O'Shea, Paul R BenjaminThere has been considerable recent interest in comparing the circuit and monoamine-based mechanisms of aversive and reward-associative conditioning in a number of vertebrate and invertebrate model systems. The mollusc Lymnaea stagnalis provides a unique opportunity to explore changes in the neural and chemical pathways underlying these two different types of conditioning as its feeding circuitry has been thoroughly characterised. Animals can learn after a single trial to associate the same CS (amyl acetate) either with a punishment (quinine) or reward (sucrose), showing either a reduced or an elevated feeding response, respectively, to the CS. We previously showed that reward conditioning strengthened the direct excitatory pathway from the lips to the feeding central pattern generator in the buccal ganglia through the activation of feeding interneurons in the cerebral ganglia. Now we demonstrate that aversive conditioning enhances the strength of a different inhibitory pathway that suppresses feeding but has no effect on the excitatory pathway. Here we show that consolidation of long-term memory (LTM) in reward conditioning depends on dopamine but not octopamine. In contrast, aversive LTM depends on octopamine but not dopamine. Octopamine is the invertebrate equivalent of noradrenalin, so these results on the monoamine dependence of reward and aversive conditioning in Lymnaea resemble, at the transmitter receptor level, those in mammals but are the opposite of those in another invertebrate group, the insects.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
European Journal of NeuroscienceISSN
0953-816XPublisher
Blackwell PublishingExternal DOI
Issue
1Volume
33Page range
143-152Department affiliated with
- Neuroscience Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes