File(s) not publicly available
Epistemic ought is a commensurable ought
journal contributionposted on 2023-06-08, 12:37 authored by Anthony BoothAnthony Booth
I argue that the claim that epistemic ought is incommensurable is self-defeating. My argument, however, depends on the truth of the premise that there can be not only epistemic reasons for belief, but also non-epistemic (e.g., moral) reasons for belief. So I also provide some support for that claim.
JournalEuropean Journal of Philosophy
Department affiliated with
- Philosophy Publications
Full text available