University of Sussex
sextrans-2018-053903.full.pdf (309.32 kB)

Healthcare provider and service user perspectives on STI risk reduction interventions for young people and MSM in the UK

Download (309.32 kB)
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:11
Version 1 2023-06-09, 18:33
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:11 authored by Anupama Roy, Carina King, Richard Gilson, Daniel Richardson, Fiona Burns, Alison Rodger, Laura Clark, Alec Miners, Alex Pollard, Sarika Desai, Julia Bailey, Maryam Shahmanesh, Carrie LlewellynCarrie Llewellyn
Objective Behavioural interventions have been shown to reduce sexual behaviours associated with increased risk of sexually transmitted infections in young people (<25 years) and men who have sex with men (MSM) internationally, but evidence from England is limited. We aimed to explore service provider and user experiences and perspectives on behavioural interventions to reduce sexual behaviour risks, and the use of automated methods to triage individuals to these services. Methods We conducted a sequential mixed methods study with sexual health service providers and users in 2015/2016. Qualitative interviews with providers and service users (heterosexual young people and MSM) in London and Brighton allowed us to explore a range of experiences and expectations. A subsequent national web-survey of service providers measured the feasibility of delivery within existing resources and preferences for intervention attributes. Results We conducted 35 service user (15 heterosexual young people; 20 MSM), and 26 provider interviews, and had 100 web-survey responses. We found considerable heterogeneity in prevention services offered. Service users and providers were broadly supportive of tailoring interventions offered, but service users raised concerns about automated, data-driven triage, particularly around equity and fairness of service delivery. Digital technologies, including social media or apps, were appealing to providers, being less resource intensive. However, one-to-one talking interventions remained popular with both service users and providers, being familiar, trust-worthy, and personal. Key tensions between desirability of interventions and availability of resources to deliver them was acknowledged/recognised by providers and users. Conclusion Overall, behavioural interventions to reduce sexual behaviour risks were viewed favourably by service providers and users, with key considerations including: privacy, personalisation and convenience. However, introducing desirable targeted interventions within heterogeneous sexual health settings will require resources to adapt interventions and research to fully understand the barriers and facilitators to use within routine services.


Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version


Sexually Transmitted Infections




BMJ Publishing Group



Page range


Department affiliated with

  • Primary Care and Public Health Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date


First Open Access (FOA) Date


First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date


Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)


    No categories selected



    Ref. manager