Investigating the conditions in which women GPs thrive: a realist review protocol
Background Women now make up approximately half of the GP workforce. However, many are leaving the profession. This could be because they experience higher rates of burnout, stress and anxiety, suicide, and lower rates of career progression. They also take on a greater load of emotional labour. Retaining this staff group is one of five priorities for future policy and research.
Aim This research aims to synthesise the available evidence on how general practice workplaces can best support women GPs to thrive at work.
Design & setting We propose to undertake a realist review, which seeks to understand why an approach may work in specific contexts. This involves building an understanding of how contextual factors affect the activation of mechanisms (ie, changes in participant reasoning or behaviours) to produce their outcomes.
Method We will locate available evidence on the topic, and, using a realist logic of analysis develop an understanding as to how, why, for whom and in what contexts women GPs thrive at work. Evidence will include: academic literature, policy documents, media items and guidelines.
Results Findings will be co-disseminated with PPI and stakeholder members to all key groups including policymakers, employers, the public, and academic audiences by a wide variety of means.
Conclusion This review is intended to improve understanding of how working environments affect women GPs. It is anticipated that findings will support the implementation of strategies to better support this group to thrive at work.
Funding
Investigating the conditions in which women GPs thrive in General Practice: What works, for whom, how and in what circumstances? : NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH RESEARCH | NIHR161818
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
BJGP OpenISSN
2398-3795Publisher
Royal College of General PractitionersPublisher URL
External DOI
Department affiliated with
- Business and Management Publications
- Management Publications
Institution
University of SussexPeer reviewed?
- Yes