File(s) not publicly available
Positivist climate conflict research: a critique
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 19:38 authored by Jan SelbyIn recent years a large body of work has emerged that uses a positivist epistemology and quantitative methods to assess the likely conflict impacts of global climate change. This article advances a critique of this positivist climate conflict research programme, identifying within it three serial shortcomings. It contends, first, that the correlations identified by this research are specious, since they always rest upon coding and causal assumptions which range from the arbitrary to the untenable. It argues, second, that even if the correlations identified within this research were significant and meaningful, they would still not constitute a sound basis for making predictions about the conflict impacts of climate change. And it submits, third, that this research programme reflects and reproduces an ensemble of Northern stereotypes, ideologies and policy agendas. A departure from positivist method is required, the article contends, if we are to get close to thinking through the wide-ranging political and conflict implications of the human transformation of the global climate.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
GeopoliticsISSN
1465-0045Publisher
Taylor and FrancisExternal DOI
Issue
4Volume
19Page range
829-856Department affiliated with
- International Relations Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes