Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better"

Rizan, Chantelle; Bhutta, Mahmood

Manuscript 3.pdf (135.31 kB)

Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better"

journal contribution

posted on 2023-06-10, 05:46 authored by Chantelle RizanChantelle Rizan, Mahmood BhuttaMahmood Bhutta

No description supplied

History

Publication status

Published

File Version

Accepted version

Journal

Journal of Endourology

ISSN

1557-900X

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert

External DOI

https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0482

Issue

11

Volume

36

Page range

1466-1467

Event location

United States

Department affiliated with

Clinical and Experimental Medicine Publications

Full text available

Yes

Peer reviewed?

Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2023-01-04

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2023-01-04

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2023-01-04

Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better"

History

Publication status

File Version

Journal

ISSN

Publisher

External DOI

Issue

Volume

Page range

Event location

Department affiliated with

Full text available

Peer reviewed?

Legacy Posted Date

First Open Access (FOA) Date

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports