University of Sussex
Browse
Sepsis_biomarkers_in_unselectred_patients_on_admission_to.pdf (503.75 kB)

Sepsis biomarkers in unselected patients on admission to intensive or high-dependency care

Download (503.75 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 15:23 authored by Martin LlewelynMartin Llewelyn, Mario Berger, Mark Gregory, Ravi Ramaiah, Amanda L Taylor, Ingo Curdt, Frédéric Lajaunias, Rolf Graf, Stuart J Blincko, Stephen Drage, Jonathan Cohen
Although many sepsis biomarkers have shown promise in selected patient groups, only C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) have entered clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate three promising novel sepsis biomarkers in unselected patients at admission to intensive care. We assessed the performance of pancreatic stone protein (PSP), soluble CD25 (sCD25) and heparin binding protein (HBP) in distinguishing patients with sepsis from those with a non-infective systemic inflammatory response and the ability of these markers to indicate severity of illness. METHODS: Plasma levels of the biomarkers, PCT and selected inflammatory cytokines were measured in samples taken from 219 patients during the first six hours of admission to intensive or high dependency care. Patients with a systemic inflammatory response were categorized as having sepsis or a non-infective aetiology, with or without markers of severity, using standard diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: Both PSP and sCD25 performed well as biomarkers of sepsis irrespective of severity of illness. For both markers the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was greater than 0.9; PSP 0.927 (0.887 to 0.968) and sCD25 0.902 (0.854 to 0.949). Procalcitonin and IL6 also performed well as markers of sepsis whilst in this intensive care unit (ICU) population, HBP did not: PCT 0.840 (0.778 to 0.901), IL6 0.805 (0.739 to 0.870) and HBP 0.607 (0.519 to 0.694). Levels of both PSP and PCT reflected severity of illness and both markers performed well in differentiating patients with severe sepsis from severely ill patients with a non-infective systemic inflammatory response: AUCs 0.955 (0.909 to 1) and 0.837 (0.732 to 0.941) respectively. Although levels of sCD25 did not correlate with severity, the addition of sCD25 to either PCT or PSP in a multivariate model improved the diagnostic accuracy of either marker alone. CONCLUSIONS: PSP and sCD25 perform well as sepsis biomarkers in patients with suspected sepsis at the time of admission to intensive or high dependency care. These markers warrant further assessment of their prognostic value. Whereas previously published data indicate HBP has clinical utility in the emergency department, it did not perform well in an intensive-care population.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Critical Care

ISSN

1466-609X

Publisher

BioMed Central

Issue

2

Volume

17

Page range

R60

Department affiliated with

  • BSMS Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2013-07-12

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2014-12-16

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2014-12-16

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports