University of Sussex

File(s) not publicly available

The Bioethical Vacuum: national policies on human embryonic stem cell research in India and China

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 16:29 authored by Margaret Sleeboom-FaulknerMargaret Sleeboom-Faulkner
Developing countries have sought to profit from the bioethical vacuum that has come about when President Bush in 2001 called for a moratorium on federal funding of human embryo stem cell research (hESR). Seizing the opportunity, both China and India started to invest proportionally many available resources in advanced technology and hESR, in the hope to achieve economic success. We argue that for the following reasons this field is hazardous especially for large developing countries: a.Capital resources are relatively important to poorer countries; b.Lucrative applications are not guaranteed: losses are harder to compensate in countries with little surplus; c.The benefits of possible profits may not go to the needy; d.It may be harder for China and India to advance in these advanced fields because of their institutional history in the field of science and technology; e.Even if applications are successful, there is a chance of developing countries becoming so-called techno-coolies: supplying standard advanced technologies, using human resources that are rare elsewhere in the world; f.A rush to grab the emerging opportunity obtained as a result of the bioethical vacuum may lead to overlooking appropriate monitoring and regulatory measures, hampering the formation of long term international collaborations and public trust. Secondly, we discuss government policies on the institutional aspects of hESR that have made China relatively attractive to foreign investors compared to India. In the concluding part, we discuss various dimensions of bioethics with regards to hESR, and how governing bodies mobilise cultural resources as economic capital.


Publication status

  • Published


Journal of International Biotechnology Law







Page range




Department affiliated with

  • Anthropology Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date


Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)


    No categories selected