jackieoreilly.pdf (146.57 kB)
Conceptual controversies: comparing the quality of work and welfare for men and women across societies
This paper critically examines a range of typologies used in comparative employment and welfare state research. The approaches examined include the societal effect, varieties of capitalism, welfare state regimes and benchmarking approaches, and their feminist critiques. The article concludes by assessing the critical merits and implicit assumptions of using such typologies for comparative research on the quality of work and welfare for men and women.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Work, Employment and SocietyISSN
09500170Publisher
SAGE PublicationsPublisher URL
Presentation Type
- paper
Event name
National Centre for Research Methods and ESRC Symposium on Small and Large-N Comparative SolutionsEvent location
University of SussexEvent type
otherEvent date
September 22-23, 2005Department affiliated with
- Sociology and Criminology Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2013-04-24First Open Access (FOA) Date
2013-04-24First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2013-04-24Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC